### WordPress - Web publishing software Copyright 2011-2019 by the contributors This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA This program incorporates work covered by the following copyright and permission notices: b2 is (c) 2001, 2002 Michel Valdrighi - m@tidakada.com - http://tidakada.com Wherever third party code has been used, credit has been given in the code's comments. b2 is released under the GPL and WordPress - Web publishing software Copyright 2003-2010 by the contributors WordPress is released under the GPL --- ### GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. ### Preamble The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Lesser General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too. When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things. To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it. For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights. We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software. Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original authors' reputations. Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all. The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow. ### TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION **0.** This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law: that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it, either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you". Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the Program (independent of having been made by running the Program). Whether that is true depends on what the Program does. **1.** You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; keep intact all the notices that refer to this License and to the absence of any warranty; and give any other recipients of the Program a copy of this License along with the Program. You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee. **2.** You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above, provided that you also meet all of these conditions: **a)** You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices stating that you changed the files and the date of any change. **b)** You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License. **c)** If the modified program normally reads commands interactively when run, you must cause it, when started running for such interactive use in the most ordinary way, to print or display an announcement including an appropriate copyright notice and a notice that there is no warranty (or else, saying that you provide a warranty) and that users may redistribute the program under these conditions, and telling the user how to view a copy of this License. (Exception: if the Program itself is interactive but does not normally print such an announcement, your work based on the Program is not required to print an announcement.) These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole. If identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program, and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those sections when you distribute them as separate works. But when you distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it. Thus, it is not the intent of this section to claim rights or contest your rights to work written entirely by you; rather, the intent is to exercise the right to control the distribution of derivative or collective works based on the Program. In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the Program with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a volume of a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other work under the scope of this License. **3.** You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it, under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following: **a)** Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or, **b)** Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or, **c)** Accompany it with the information you received as to the offer to distribute corresponding source code. (This alternative is allowed only for noncommercial distribution and only if you received the program in object code or executable form with such an offer, in accord with Subsection b above.) The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to control compilation and installation of the executable. However, as a special exception, the source code distributed need not include anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component itself accompanies the executable. If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent access to copy the source code from the same place counts as distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not compelled to copy the source along with the object code. **4.** You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Program except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the Program is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License. However, parties who have received copies, or rights, from you under this License will not have their licenses terminated so long as such parties remain in full compliance. **5.** You are not required to accept this License, since you have not signed it. However, nothing else grants you permission to modify or distribute the Program or its derivative works. These actions are prohibited by law if you do not accept this License. Therefore, by modifying or distributing the Program (or any work based on the Program), you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so, and all its terms and conditions for copying, distributing or modifying the Program or works based on it. **6.** Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to these terms and conditions. You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein. You are not responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties to this License. **7.** If, as a consequence of a court judgment or allegation of patent infringement or for any other reason (not limited to patent issues), conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not excuse you from the conditions of this License. If you cannot distribute so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may not distribute the Program at all. For example, if a patent license would not permit royalty-free redistribution of the Program by all those who receive copies directly or indirectly through you, then the only way you could satisfy both it and this License would be to refrain entirely from distribution of the Program. If any portion of this section is held invalid or unenforceable under any particular circumstance, the balance of the section is intended to apply and the section as a whole is intended to apply in other circumstances. It is not the purpose of this section to induce you to infringe any patents or other property right claims or to contest validity of any such claims; this section has the sole purpose of protecting the integrity of the free software distribution system, which is implemented by public license practices. Many people have made generous contributions to the wide range of software distributed through that system in reliance on consistent application of that system; it is up to the author/donor to decide if he or she is willing to distribute software through any other system and a licensee cannot impose that choice. This section is intended to make thoroughly clear what is believed to be a consequence of the rest of this License. **8.** If the distribution and/or use of the Program is restricted in certain countries either by patents or by copyrighted interfaces, the original copyright holder who places the Program under this License may add an explicit geographical distribution limitation excluding those countries, so that distribution is permitted only in or among countries not thus excluded. In such case, this License incorporates the limitation as if written in the body of this License. **9.** The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions of the General Public License from time to time. Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or concerns. Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the Program specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and "any later version", you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that version or of any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. **10.** If you wish to incorporate parts of the Program into other free programs whose distribution conditions are different, write to the author to ask for permission. For software which is copyrighted by the Free Software Foundation, write to the Free Software Foundation; we sometimes make exceptions for this. Our decision will be guided by the two goals of preserving the free status of all derivatives of our free software and of promoting the sharing and reuse of software generally. **NO WARRANTY** **11.** BECAUSE THE PROGRAM IS LICENSED FREE OF CHARGE, THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION. **12.** IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MAY MODIFY AND/OR REDISTRIBUTE THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY YOU OR THIRD PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAMS), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. ### END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS ### How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it free software which everyone can redistribute and change under these terms. To do so, attach the following notices to the program. It is safest to attach them to the start of each source file to most effectively convey the exclusion of warranty; and each file should have at least the "copyright" line and a pointer to where the full notice is found. one line to give the program's name and an idea of what it does. Copyright (C) yyyy name of author This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail. If the program is interactive, make it output a short notice like this when it starts in an interactive mode: Gnomovision version 69, Copyright (C) year name of author Gnomovision comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `show w'. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `show c' for details. The hypothetical commands \`show w' and \`show c' should show the appropriate parts of the General Public License. Of course, the commands you use may be called something other than \`show w' and \`show c'; they could even be mouse-clicks or menu items--whatever suits your program. You should also get your employer (if you work as a programmer) or your school, if any, to sign a "copyright disclaimer" for the program, if necessary. Here is a sample; alter the names: Yoyodyne, Inc., hereby disclaims all copyright interest in the program `Gnomovision' (which makes passes at compilers) written by James Hacker. signature of Ty Coon, 1 April 1989 Ty Coon, President of Vice This General Public License does not permit incorporating your program into proprietary programs. If your program is a subroutine library, you may consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with the library. If this is what you want to do, use the [GNU Lesser General Public License](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html) instead of this License. How One Private Real Estate Firm is Courting Financial Advisors - sinth.info

How One Private Real Estate Firm is Courting Financial Advisors

[ad_1]

With high-net-worth individuals and their financial advisors showing a growing appetite for alternative investments, real estate asset managers are starting to adopt their strategies to court those capital sources by building up their relationships with RIAs. For CIM Group the move from relying largely on institutional investors to incorporating individual investors started in earnest six years ago with its purchase of Cole Capital, an investment manager with $7.6 billion in assets at the time, including five non-listed REITs and established relationships with independent broker-dealers and RIAs.

While some of its efforts to connect with financial advisors were disrupted by the pandemic—nothing beats meeting with advisors face-to-face, according to Emily Vande Krol, principal at CIM and president of CCO Capital LLC, its registered broker-dealer—the firm has continued to build up its wealth channel outreach capabilities in recent years. It aims to eventually reach a 50/50 balance among its capital sources between institutional and high-net-worth/individual investors.

To get there, CIM has split its wealth-focused team into three groups so that each group can pursue relationships with a particular segment of the wealth management industry, including broker/dealers, wirehouses and RIAs. To add to that specialization, plans are underway to create a platform that will focus on tax-advantaged investment strategies for the private wealth universe.

Meanwhile, on the external front, Vand Krol noted the firm has a partnership with fintech platform CAIS, which today supports more than 32,000 advisors.

“We were involved with them as a company very early on in their launch as we were intrigued by the technology side of the business that they were building,” Vande Krol said. In addition, “We were a first mover with them to raise our hand and say, ‘Let us work alongside you, let us be your test run of different asset classes in the alternative space.’”

Today, the firm has a variety of products that are accessible to individual investors with strategies ranging from core to opportunistic, some with a minimum requirement of just a few thousand dollars, she noted. In particular, CIM is currently focusing on investment opportunities in real estate credit and in infrastructure, including energy renewables, which have been areas where CIM has “excelled in previously” and which tend to be popular investment strategies in this market environment.

WealthManagement.com talked to Vande Krol about how the firm has been growing its offerings for individual investors, how it works together with the RIA and financial advisor community and how it views its role in the alternatives space.

This Q&A has been edited for length, style and clarity.

WealthManagement.com: I understand that historically the CIM Group has relied more on institutional investors for equity. So, I wanted to get a sense at what point did CIM decide that it would like to move also toward the wealth channel and what precipitated this move?

Emily-Vande-Krol.jpgEmily Vande Krol: As an organization, we were founded in 1994. We focused on the multifamily and retail projects across southern California. And then in 2000, was when we launched our first institutional fund. So historically focused on the institutional equity raise. What we recognized, though, is what the space has recognized overall and it’s that movement of capital from the defined benefit or pension plans to defined contribution plans. As we looked at it as an organization, we had incredible success on the institutional side, so how do we start to follow that money and tap into that opportunity as well?

As we recognized those changes and our desire to access that larger pool of investors and start to offer what we had for institutions to financial advisors and intermediaries, we looked at it and [realized] the team that we had in place would not be able to cover the large stretch in demand of the RIA and the broker/dealer space. We acquired an organization [Cole Capital] in 2018 with a business that possesses the skill sets, the relationships and the distribution team specifically to foray into the private wealth space. We officially launched those efforts in 2018 and we’ve been refining it since.

WM: Does the firm have a breakdown in mind for, “We’d like for this share of our capital to come from the institutional side and this share from the wealth side”? How much would CIM like to grow its wealth business?

EVK: We would love to grow to a position where we are looking at, as a first hurdle, a 50/50 split between our wealth assets and our institutional assets. And a big piece of that is just continuing to refine our offerings in a way that fits the private wealth space and bring exactly what we’ve been doing for the institutional investors return-wise, asset opportunity-wise to private wealth.

WM: I am curious—after the acquisition of Cole Capital, did you hire any significant number of additional people to help with capital raising in the wealth space?

EVK: We did hire additional people. We have split our wealth team into three different groups, based on the type of advisor they would be calling on, making sure that we are aligning specifically with that space. So, we have a team that is focused on the independent broker/dealers. We have a team that is focused on our bank and wirehouse relationships. And then a team that is specifically focused on RIAs and high-net-worth individuals that would invest directly. We went from one team to a compilation of three channels.

WM: I understand you have a relationship with CAIS. If you can tell me how that relationship came about?

EVK: We were actually involved with them as a company very early on in their launch as we were intrigued by the technology side of the business that they were building. And as we’ve grown out of that, we were a first mover with them to raise our hand and say, “Let us work alongside you, let us be your test run of different asset classes in the alternative space.” So, we worked closely with them, for example, in starting to build a technology platform for our non-traded preferred and an opportunity to be able to streamline the processing on that.

They are a fascinating organization. They are obviously growing quickly and there are firms that will decide, and have [decided], that that’s the way they are going to process business. So, we wanted to make sure that we were aligned with them early on, so that CIM would continue to be an option to those advisors as they started to move on to the CAIS platform.

WM: In terms of reaching the wealth channel, reaching RIAs, reaching individual investors and getting them to invest with CIM Group’s opportunities, what have been the biggest challenges?

EVK: COVID hit right in the middle, so being able to reach financial advisors and RIAs as we started to shift into work from home was definitely a new challenge. I think we’ve adopted very well though. We look to meet the financial advisor or the RIA exactly where they are with the type of information and cadence and delivery that they need for their business.

We do a lot of face-to-face meetings and that’s starting to come back. To me, that’s where we are always going to have the greatest success, but we understand that’s not always possible. So, we sharpened ourselves on the delivery of virtual meetings, regular fund updates in a proactive way that they can access either via a live webinar or through recordings as well. And then, opportunities to be able to do thought leadership pieces, delivering that through social media and email.

We’ve needed to become more creative with how we deliver our communication to advisors because we all get inundated with phone calls, we all get inundated with emails and so finding that space to be able to have a conversation will continue to be the largest challenge.

WM: You mentioned thought leadership pieces that you are trying to get in front of advisors. How much education do you feel they need about opportunities that are available in commercial real estate, in real estate debt and other investments that CIM offers?

EVK: I think advisors are always looking for soundbites that they can utilize with their client. But, also, the space that they may be investing in, all of this moves so quickly. And as a financial advisor, when you are looking at the breadth of investment opportunities that you have you have to rely on your relationships with someone like CIM to be able to provide you the up-to-date soundbites that [show] you are staying up to speed on the ever-changing space, but have the confidence that they are the leader in the space as well.

We are trying to take that responsibility out of the hands of the financial advisor and feed it to them in a timely way in the areas and the asset classes where we are seeing some of the biggest changes. We’ve gone through a lot of market disruption over the last several years and [we are] trying to make it as easy for that advisor to get their snippets of information and feel confidence with who they are investing in and our areas of expertise. And then also confident in relaying that to their end investor.

WM: I know that CIM invests across different risk spectrums and different sectors. At the current moment, given the market environment we are in, are there certain types of assets or certain risk levels that the firm prefers to pursue?

EVK: Yes, we definitely have some frontrunners in areas that we are bullish on. CIM Group is vertically integrated and what that’s allowing us to do is really pivot with the asset classes and the structure that is most relevant for today’s market.

We are active in the three major asset classes, so we have real estate equity, debt and infrastructure and then we are starting to grow offerings in specific strategies around tax advantaged opportunities and that’s built specifically for the private wealth obviously and that need. For instance, right now we are extremely bullish in the private debt and debt opportunities within the marketplace. And then we also have seen this big shift into infrastructure, looking at data centers, solar, other renewable energy type of opportunities. They are very strong investment opportunities at this point and areas that we excelled in previously and can laser focus ourselves in those specific markets.

WM: In terms of specific products, what offerings do you have right now that are available to RIAs and individual investors? And what kind of response are you getting from them?

EVK: We have taken a laser focus on packaging our current institutional offerings for private wealth. I think we all know the popular buzzword of the day is “democratization” of alternatives. But what does that really mean?

So, making sure that we are offering opportunities for the lower investment requirements, lower suitability, that it can be invested in by a larger pool of investors. But what’s important to us is making sure that it stays the same quality investment that we offer institutional. With that you’ll see, for example, we have our closed-end interval product that is approved and we got exemptive relief on that, so that the private wealth investors are investing directly alongside some of our institutional funds. And that has been very well received in the marketplace, easy to do business in, which is always a plus as well and gives exposure to those institutional investments.

We also have an offering in the Opportunity Zone space. We have an infrastructure offering and we also have a private debt portfolio. Forward-looking, we are actively looking right now in the 1031 space as well for private wealth. That’s about the tax-advantaged platform that I mentioned earlier.

WM: You mentioned the lower investment requirements and lower suitability requirements to appeal to that wealth segment. Can you tell me what has been the lowest investment minimum that you’ve been able to offer on your products? Do you offer any products that are open to non-accredited investors?

EVK: Our closed-end interval product is the one that is most widely available, so that does not require an accredited investor [status]. And we have investments as low as just a couple thousand dollars into that.

When it comes to parallel funds within the institutional space, you are going to still see an accredited investor threshold for that. But it’s still an opportunity down from the qualified investor (QP) level.

So, we aim for accredited and we aim for smaller investment sizes, specifically when it comes to the institutional type assets.

WM: You mentioned the product aimed at providing tax advantages to the wealth channel. How important is that feature to individual investors?

EVK: I would be surprised if our team walks out of a meeting with a financial advisor and taxes have not been a topic of part of the conversation.

It’s something that is applicable to every single investor, regardless of where they are in age, near retirement, asset levels, etc. We are all having to address it. So being able to offer thoughtful investments around that particular topic is applicable to every private wealth investor and that’s where we really want to look to build things along the strength of CIM, the strength of our investment platform, but then tailor that for that tax advantage piece.

WM: When it comes to getting a response from the RIAs for the offerings that you mentioned, did you notice a particular preference for some product types? Is the interest kind of evenly spread across the board?

EVK: I think when you are looking at appealing to the masses, you always run into ease of doing business, so, “How am I having to invest into that product?” And if you have an interval fund and you are talking a ticker symbol vs. a private offering where we are looking at a 30-page sub-doc that has to be completed, there is a wide range there.

We want to consider ease of business for the financial advisor, the tax situation—1099 is highly preferred if you can structure it that way. Those two things, in particular, are just so important to a financial advisor when they are looking at, “How can I really extend [this] to my investor base?” That is back again to the democratization of alternatives and ease of getting into these types of investments.

WM: I also wanted to talk about what kinds of returns are you seeking to deliver with the opportunities that you have available right now?

EVK: We are really trying to stretch. It’s going to be specific to each product, but what we are aiming to do is fill the gaps on that risk/return profile. As far as each individual fund, they are going to vary from opportunistic type returns all the way to a core real estate stabilized return.

[ad_2]

Source link

Previous Article

Firing Your Financial Advisor and Becoming a DIY Investor — 6 Steps to Make It a Smooth Transition

Next Article

Retirees Who Miss This IRS Deadline Risk a Hefty Penalty - MSN