### WordPress - Web publishing software Copyright 2011-2019 by the contributors This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA This program incorporates work covered by the following copyright and permission notices: b2 is (c) 2001, 2002 Michel Valdrighi - m@tidakada.com - http://tidakada.com Wherever third party code has been used, credit has been given in the code's comments. b2 is released under the GPL and WordPress - Web publishing software Copyright 2003-2010 by the contributors WordPress is released under the GPL --- ### GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. ### Preamble The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Lesser General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too. When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things. To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it. For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights. We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software. Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original authors' reputations. Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all. The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow. ### TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION **0.** This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law: that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it, either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you". Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the Program (independent of having been made by running the Program). Whether that is true depends on what the Program does. **1.** You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; keep intact all the notices that refer to this License and to the absence of any warranty; and give any other recipients of the Program a copy of this License along with the Program. You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee. **2.** You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above, provided that you also meet all of these conditions: **a)** You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices stating that you changed the files and the date of any change. **b)** You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License. **c)** If the modified program normally reads commands interactively when run, you must cause it, when started running for such interactive use in the most ordinary way, to print or display an announcement including an appropriate copyright notice and a notice that there is no warranty (or else, saying that you provide a warranty) and that users may redistribute the program under these conditions, and telling the user how to view a copy of this License. (Exception: if the Program itself is interactive but does not normally print such an announcement, your work based on the Program is not required to print an announcement.) These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole. If identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program, and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those sections when you distribute them as separate works. But when you distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it. Thus, it is not the intent of this section to claim rights or contest your rights to work written entirely by you; rather, the intent is to exercise the right to control the distribution of derivative or collective works based on the Program. In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the Program with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a volume of a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other work under the scope of this License. **3.** You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it, under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following: **a)** Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or, **b)** Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange; or, **c)** Accompany it with the information you received as to the offer to distribute corresponding source code. (This alternative is allowed only for noncommercial distribution and only if you received the program in object code or executable form with such an offer, in accord with Subsection b above.) The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to control compilation and installation of the executable. However, as a special exception, the source code distributed need not include anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component itself accompanies the executable. If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent access to copy the source code from the same place counts as distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not compelled to copy the source along with the object code. **4.** You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Program except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the Program is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License. However, parties who have received copies, or rights, from you under this License will not have their licenses terminated so long as such parties remain in full compliance. **5.** You are not required to accept this License, since you have not signed it. However, nothing else grants you permission to modify or distribute the Program or its derivative works. These actions are prohibited by law if you do not accept this License. Therefore, by modifying or distributing the Program (or any work based on the Program), you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so, and all its terms and conditions for copying, distributing or modifying the Program or works based on it. **6.** Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to these terms and conditions. You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein. You are not responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties to this License. **7.** If, as a consequence of a court judgment or allegation of patent infringement or for any other reason (not limited to patent issues), conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not excuse you from the conditions of this License. If you cannot distribute so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may not distribute the Program at all. For example, if a patent license would not permit royalty-free redistribution of the Program by all those who receive copies directly or indirectly through you, then the only way you could satisfy both it and this License would be to refrain entirely from distribution of the Program. If any portion of this section is held invalid or unenforceable under any particular circumstance, the balance of the section is intended to apply and the section as a whole is intended to apply in other circumstances. It is not the purpose of this section to induce you to infringe any patents or other property right claims or to contest validity of any such claims; this section has the sole purpose of protecting the integrity of the free software distribution system, which is implemented by public license practices. Many people have made generous contributions to the wide range of software distributed through that system in reliance on consistent application of that system; it is up to the author/donor to decide if he or she is willing to distribute software through any other system and a licensee cannot impose that choice. This section is intended to make thoroughly clear what is believed to be a consequence of the rest of this License. **8.** If the distribution and/or use of the Program is restricted in certain countries either by patents or by copyrighted interfaces, the original copyright holder who places the Program under this License may add an explicit geographical distribution limitation excluding those countries, so that distribution is permitted only in or among countries not thus excluded. In such case, this License incorporates the limitation as if written in the body of this License. **9.** The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions of the General Public License from time to time. Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or concerns. Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the Program specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and "any later version", you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that version or of any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. **10.** If you wish to incorporate parts of the Program into other free programs whose distribution conditions are different, write to the author to ask for permission. For software which is copyrighted by the Free Software Foundation, write to the Free Software Foundation; we sometimes make exceptions for this. Our decision will be guided by the two goals of preserving the free status of all derivatives of our free software and of promoting the sharing and reuse of software generally. **NO WARRANTY** **11.** BECAUSE THE PROGRAM IS LICENSED FREE OF CHARGE, THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW. EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION. **12.** IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MAY MODIFY AND/OR REDISTRIBUTE THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING ANY GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY YOU OR THIRD PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAMS), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. ### END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS ### How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it free software which everyone can redistribute and change under these terms. To do so, attach the following notices to the program. It is safest to attach them to the start of each source file to most effectively convey the exclusion of warranty; and each file should have at least the "copyright" line and a pointer to where the full notice is found. one line to give the program's name and an idea of what it does. Copyright (C) yyyy name of author This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail. If the program is interactive, make it output a short notice like this when it starts in an interactive mode: Gnomovision version 69, Copyright (C) year name of author Gnomovision comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `show w'. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `show c' for details. The hypothetical commands \`show w' and \`show c' should show the appropriate parts of the General Public License. Of course, the commands you use may be called something other than \`show w' and \`show c'; they could even be mouse-clicks or menu items--whatever suits your program. You should also get your employer (if you work as a programmer) or your school, if any, to sign a "copyright disclaimer" for the program, if necessary. Here is a sample; alter the names: Yoyodyne, Inc., hereby disclaims all copyright interest in the program `Gnomovision' (which makes passes at compilers) written by James Hacker. signature of Ty Coon, 1 April 1989 Ty Coon, President of Vice This General Public License does not permit incorporating your program into proprietary programs. If your program is a subroutine library, you may consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with the library. If this is what you want to do, use the [GNU Lesser General Public License](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html) instead of this License. How This Financial Advisor Added $50 Million in AUM With SmartAdvisor - sinth.info

How This Financial Advisor Added $50 Million in AUM With SmartAdvisor

[ad_1]

Michael Collins, CFA® and founder of WinCap Financial

Michael Collins, CFA® and founder of WinCap Financial

Lead generation is one of the biggest challenges financial advisors face when trying to grow their business. But one advisor found the sweet spot – bringing in roughly 50 families and $50 million in AUM in just a few years.

SmartAsset CEO Michael Carvin sat down with Michael Collins, CFA® to get a better understanding of his success.

Collins has been in wealth management since 2012. Seeing the potential in SmartAsset’s lead generation platform, he opened his own firm, WinCap Financial, in 2018. Since, Collins has built 80% of his business through SmartAsset.

After trying a slew of other available lead generation approaches, Collins found the best ROI in SmartAsset. Every dollar spent on the platform has led to double that in recurring revenue: “It’s been a game changer for us,” Collins says.

But in the lead generation business, building trust among prospects is a big part of the equation. Collins’ secret? Offering two hours of financial services to potential clients. While the upfront investment may seem high, the payout has been even higher.

What advice would he give advisors looking to grow their books? “You have to invest in yourself to grow your practice, and SmartAsset provides a turnkey solution for growth.”

Read more about what Collins is doing to capture business in the interview transcript below.

Learn more about the SmartAdvisor platform and how you can generate more leads.


Michael Carvin, CEO of SmartAsset: Michael, thank you for joining me today. I’m excited to discuss your experience with SmartAsset and the SmartAdvisor lead-matching platform.

Michael Collins, CFA® and founder of WinCap Financial: Likewise, thanks for having me Michael.

Carvin: What marketing activities have you tried in addition to SmartAsset?

Collins: We’ve tried other lead-generation services and marketing on Facebook and Instagram in the past. I’ve talked to countless other potential lead sources too. Some of them have been cost effective but the quality of the lead flow was low. Others seemed very fly-by-night, or had too much of an ambulance-chaser approach.

Carvin:  What are your most important acquisition channels currently?

Collins: The most important client acquisition strategy for us has been SmartAsset. The quality and ROI of SmartAsset leads has been much higher than other services we have tried. It’s been a game changer for us. SmartAsset and organic leads have been our highest quality lead sources. Our organic referrals come from mostly existing clients, including former SmartAsset leads. I have received four clients who were referrals from SmartAsset clients.

Carvin: Have you tried paid social media marketing or Google Adwords, or hosting seminars?

Collins: No I haven’t really experimented too much with that. I feel like the kind of social media advertising is not a good spend for me in terms of driving engagement. I could do more work on that front in terms of having a landing page and offering something like a pdf of a 10-point retirement plan. But you know I’ve really been focused on my time on what works best: So far that’s been you guys.

Carvin: Do you employ a content strategy?

Collins: I think our marketing drip that we surround all prospects and clients with is pretty powerful, so we have a Substack blog. The blog basically summarizes what happened last week and what happens next week – like if there’s a threat of a government shutdown and how it would impact clients. It’s drafted by AI for time efficiency and then I add color around all of that stuff. It goes out to clients and prospects once a week.

It keeps me front of mind. I have about a thousand people on the blog. Readership rate is about 50% which is pretty high. I pay attention to the blog stats. It lets me see who my biggest readers are. If I see a prospect that I haven’t talked to in three years reads our blog twice a week, that’s an indicator that I should follow up with this guy.

Carvin: That’s really interesting. Would love to jump into your experience working with SmartAsset and our SmartAdvisor marketplace. What’s your history working with us?

Collins: I discovered SmartAsset at an eMoney conference around 2018 and I started using the platform promptly after I got an experimental budget from my prior firm – about a $10,000 annual spend. I remember my exact first success on the platform: It was a million dollar client and that gave the organization I was working for at the time the confidence to continue funding.

My proposition to the firm at the time was what I heard from SmartAsset reps: We’ll close about one out of 20 leads. So, let me buy 40 leads to get a reasonable sample size and see if it works. Worst case scenario: We wasted money on marketing, which people do all the time. Best case scenario: It drives revenue.

Advisors receive contact information for new leads.

Advisors receive contact information for new leads.

Carvin: And how is your account set up today?

Collins: One of the big factors in me going out on my own was that I could amplify my own budget on SmartAsset significantly to drive growth. We currently spend about $4,000 a month. I probably increase my budget every year by 25 to 50% depending on my available cash flow. But you know the model’s really still been the same: For every $1 I put in, I earn $2 in recurring revenue.

Carvin: Those are great metrics. Maybe we can jump into how you’re achieving that. Can you talk a little bit about the number of leads you’re receiving each month and what your meeting and close rates look like?

Collins: Right now I’m getting between about 15 to 20 leads a month. My contact rate – which is just when someone replies to an email, answers a call, or replies to a text – shows some sign of life from about 62% of leads. Over two years, my meeting rate is about 15%. So for every 20 leads I get I’m booking about three meetings. And then my meeting-to-close ratio is about 33%, so basically for every three meetings I get a client.

That seems to be like clockwork, though I never know which one of the three it’s going to be. I’m always an optimist but the metrics have stayed really tight. My overall close rate is about 4%, and it takes me 98 days to close the average client. My quickest close on SmartAsset was eight days, and the longest close was 249 days – mostly because they were waiting for a liquidity event to happen.

Carvin: That’s great. In terms of the kinds of clients that you’re getting, it sounds like you’re targeting the $1 million plus category. What are the average investable assets that you’re seeing?

Collins: Usually $1 million and up. Originally I did start with the $250k to $1 million category. Sometimes I would get to the finish line with someone in that range to find out they only have $100k of assets available to invest, with the other $600k tied up in a 401(k). So when I target $1 million and up, even if half the money’s in a 401(k), I still have $500k of investment opportunity. And then on average I’m seeing potential clients with around $2 million come through. Sometimes you see a whale with $5 million plus, but those are harder to capture.

Carvin: We usually see a contact rate closer to 50% across the platform, so a 60% contact rate is great. What are you doing to achieve that?

Collins: So you know first it always starts out with speed to lead right? If you’re first to call, you’re more likely to get someone who’s interested. So I always treat it like an old school radio call-in contest. Then after I call, I have an email template that I can customize to the individual person. I’ll go on Linkedin just to do a little quick due diligence on the prospect and then I’ll send that email template that basically says, ‘This is who we are. We’re fiduciary.’

But the response rate on emails is not as good as a call. I’m more likely to book a meeting from a phone call than someone following up from the meeting by about 4x, so getting them on the phone is always the most powerful. So, I’ll follow up if I don’t hear back.

What I really believe drives the next step – meetings – is that we give all potential clients 2 hours of complimentary advice. That’s what really drives the engagement. And most clients I see opting for the complimentary financial planning services are in the $2 to $3 million range.

Carvin: I’d imagine a lot of advisors reading this are thinking: Jeeze, a two-hour free consultation. That could add up to a lot of time that doesn’t turn into revenue. Can you talk a little bit more about what your advice might be to skeptical advisors?

Collins: Some advisors I’ve spoken to who never used the platform are like, ‘Wow you’re giving away a lot of time.’ My response is that I’m already giving away a lot of time sending emails and making calls, so following it up with an extra two-hours for each prospect to make the conversion is a good ROI. And really, I’m giving away 6 hours of time based on my 33% meeting-to-close rate – three 2-hour complimentary meetings. But that turns into $10k of recurring revenue at a minimum. So you know I think it’s a pretty powerful use of my time.

One time, a prospect with $3 million in assets wanted me to meet him at his office in Rhode Island. It was a two-hour drive, so sometimes the hours are a bit more than the two hours of financial planning.

Let’s say traveling takes double the donated time. Yeah, I’m giving away 12 hours to get $10,000 in recurring revenue. But it’s a real value add, and in this business, most of the work is upfront. Once we’ve done the plan, the heavy lift is already done if they onboard. That’s the easy part, right? Because everything’s already mapped out.

Carvin: That all makes perfect sense. Okay so 60% contact rate, 15% meeting rate and then you’re closing one in three of those meetings. Tell me about the meetings and what you’re doing to turn those meetings into new clients.

Collins: I do offer to most prospects that I’ll come to their home or take them out to eat, and I let them decide what’s best. I treat them like a client. I go there, and we use eMoney as a financial planning tool. We’ll do an asset inventory, I’ll get an idea of their spending or what they want that to look like.

Most people I connect with are $1 million plus. They tend to be people in their late fifties, early sixties, and I’m giving them the roadmap at the horizon of their retirement. We’re figuring out the asset allocation, what their withdrawal rate in retirement should look like if they’re honest about their spending number, and then kind of some of the ABCs of financial planning. We discuss things regular people don’t think about in the day-to-day to add value.
A lot of people I come across also need just good housekeeping. Another prospect I met in New York had eight different orphan 401(k) accounts, and I said, let’s work together for a year because you’ll just benefit from a cleanup. You have assets over there that don’t know what the assets on the other side are doing, and you could just be more organized. Also, if something were to happen to you, you don’t want your spouse having to look through seven different accounts and then wonder if there’s still more out there.

Carvin: Can you tell us a little bit about how you staff this? Michael, are you doing this all yourself, or do you have help?

Collins: I have two analysts that are mostly focused on assisting in research, handling onboarding paperwork, maintaining the websites and helping me transfer assets. My custodial partners Fidelity and Schwab make things very easy. Most paperwork is done electronically. I think the biggest thing is just being available to your clients when they need you. Is someone going to be there to respond? I, or someone on my team, typically respond within 24 hours and I think that’s important.

Carvin: Absolutely. And are they helping at all with the outreach – the calling and emailing – or is that all you?

Collins: They help with outreach. I won’t have them do first outreach but, for example, a good exercise I had one of my analysts do last week was to call people from a year ago, starting in January of 2022 and going down the list to just repeat the offer. We’ve had some success there too, where we book meetings from what most would consider stale prospects.

Carvin: That’s great. I would love to hear any thoughts or recommendations you have for us for how we can improve our advisor platform.

Collins: Well you guys have been great. But I think removing the 90-day threshold on duplicate leads would help. If it’s not a great match the first time around, time is unlikely to change that. Something else you’ll always hear me say is improving lead quality, but again, compared to peers SmartAsset has been the best. But that’s something I’d always like to see no matter what.

Carvin: A hundred percent. And we’ve got some really exciting things that we’re working on. Our data science team is really helping us understand how to promote more of the good referrals and limit more of the less-good ones. You know this better than anyone, Michael, but it’s a numbers game. It’s not really possible to take the bad leads to zero, but we can do a lot more to make sure the lead quality mix is always improving. We get a huge amount of data back from our partners, and we now have the highest lead quality the platform has ever seen.

Collins: Another thing to focus on is that while I was getting some sign of life from 60% of leads, I never hear from the other 40%. I’ve talked to some people who have not had great success on the platform, and I think it’s because they start slow or don’t have enough volume. If you buy five leads a month, and you close one out of 20 and it takes a hundred days to close, you could have six months before you see your first success. Some might want to give up before they let the numbers play out. I think that’s important, and I feel like my quality has improved as I’ve increased the leads.

It’s like golf or any other sport: If I’m doing five per month I’m not going to be ready to go as quickly in terms of contacting people and following up. But if I’m getting 20 leads per month, I’m getting a lead a day. So I know it’s coming. Sometimes they come in several times in one day, but the point is you need enough volume to find success.

Carvin: It’s why we say that the strongest indicator of whether an advisor is going to stick with the platform or not is the number of leads they get per month. Ten seems to be that tipping point.

Collins: That makes sense based on what I’ve seen.

Carvin: Below 10, and you’re getting five or six at-bats per month. It’s just not enough to really get a feel for whether or not this can impact your business – and you know what? You shared with us that you’ve generated $50 million in assets and you’re getting 15 to 20 leads per month.

Collins: You know, at the pace I spend, I think about it in terms of my lifestyle and time. Getting about 20 leads per month means I’m probably gonna have a prospect meeting about once a week. So you know you have to have the capacity.

And I think I have a better hit rate because I’ve readjusted since the pandemic. You can just offer everyone a Zoom meeting but I think you know now that we’ve returned to a more normal environment, I make myself available. But I get to choose my geography, too. I’m in Boston so I also target New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts.

Carvin: One thing I’ll share with you that one of our largest partners told us: Close to half their closes come after the six-month mark. So I’d wager that a lot of those free consultations – the two of three that don’t turn into new business within the first hundred days – will be good potential clients down the road. I’d keep circling back with those people. 

I’d love to hear about your aspirations for WinCap. You’re $65 million in AUM today – where do you want to take this?

Collins: I’m kind of at an interesting inflection point based on the growth we had this year. We’re on pace to hit $100 million in AUM either late next year or early in 2025. Then I have to decide if I want to kind of close the doors on the new clients and have a lifestyle practice with about a hundred clients. Or, do I onboard other advisors? In this environment more and more advisors have been reaching out to me. So it’s a little bit of a mystery at the moment in terms of which direction I’ll go in.

I imagine I’ll probably onboard three or four advisors within the next six months. I think having a little bit of depth will increase my close rate on some of the business I haven’t won. Some potential clients I’ve talked to have been pretty frank: ‘We like you a lot. But we went with someone who had a team of three people.’ You know if I come across a $5 million prospect as a solo practitioner, I’ll probably always lose to a team at JP Morgan or Goldman, but it’s still great to have those opportunities.

Carvin: What advice would you give to advisors early in their career who want to build a large book of business? 

Collins: You have to invest in yourself to grow your practice. We have seen many advisors struggle to grow their book and SmartAsset provides a turnkey solution for building our practice. I would not have had the confidence to start my own firm without SmartAsset.

Carvin: Well, your close rates are fantastic Michael. This has been a great conversation. I really appreciate you taking the time to talk with us.

Collins: Thanks so much.

Learn more about generating leads with the SmartAdvisor platform.

*Michael Collins, CFA®, is a client of the SmartAdvisor Platform and has not been compensated for his participation in this interview. Michael’s experience and metrics regarding SmartAdvisor are his own. Results may not be the same for everyone who uses SmartAdvisor.

Photo credit: ©iStock.com/Petar Chernaev, ©iStock.com/Ridofranz

The post How This Financial Advisor Added $50 Million in AUM With SmartAdvisor appeared first on SmartReads by SmartAsset.

[ad_2]

Source link

Previous Article

Luis F. Rosa of Build a Better Financial Future LLC and the BLX Internship Program

Next Article

Your stock losses could save you money — but financial planners say not to rush into anything